#Windows game dvr vs raptr how to#
#Windows game dvr vs raptr 1080p#
#Windows game dvr vs raptr driver#

You can even go as low as $400 depending on your needs! Check out my article ' How to build a compact budget gaming PC for $400' to see an example of a competent budget gaming PC. You could even buy a slightly cheaper motherboard. Note that these are quality components, not budget brands, which goes a long way toward the longevity of and satisfaction with your custom built machine. You could remove the SSD from the equation and drop it down to $760 or so. To give you an idea of the value, the system includes Windows 8.1, an SSD, and a great CPU cooler.

Want a specific example of performance? Look to my review of the GTX 960 which is my go-to card for this budget.

#Windows game dvr vs raptr 1080p#

I have internal benchmarks for most of these cards, and I'm happy to share them, so just ask!Ībove, I've attached a sample build I created at PCPartPicker that's roughly $815 including shipping, and is targeted at being a cool and quiet machine capable of high-end 1080p gaming. Make sure to research and read reviews from people you trust. It depends on the model, the pricing, and the intended use. The bottom line here is that when it comes to AMD versus Nvidia graphics cards, I can't give a blanket recommendation. With Nvidia hardware, you can also stream your games to a Shield handheld, Shield tablet, or upcoming Shield console in your living room. But Nvidia's GeForce Experience is more elegant, and their recorded videos look much better than AMD's Raptr/Gaming Evolved client. Both have Game DVR functionality and one-button Twitch streaming. Both AMD and Nvidia have solutions to auto-optimize your games for ideal graphical settings based on your hardware. With graphics cards, the software ecosystem is also important.

#Windows game dvr vs raptr driver#

And while the frequency and benefits of AMD's driver updates have improved dramatically in the past year, I feel Nvidia still has them beat in terms of timeliness and consistency. However, this normally comes at the cost of higher power consumption, which affects electric bills if that's something you're concerned about. They offer the most performance for your dollar, period. In the current climate, AMD's graphics cards mirror the benefits of their CPU companions. It will be interesting to see how DirectX 12 affects this choice, however, as it will allow more efficient use of multi-core CPUs.įor a sub-$1000 PC gaming build, look to AMD's FX-8320, or Intel's Core i5 CPUs.ĪMD versus Nvidia Graphics Cards: As I've said previously, this particular argument is very nuanced and could consume the pages of an entire daily website devoted to it.

There are an assortment of arguments for and against choosing each, but on a budget I'll confidently recommend AMD CPUs, provided you spend an extra $15 to $30 for a 3rd party CPU cooler. While AMD is typically associated with superior multi-core performance at a better value. Intel vs AMD CPUs: Historically, Intel is know for faster single-core performance and better thermals (staying cooler) but at a slightly premium price.